Just now, however, I happened to surf over to The Corner for the first time in a day and it was....instructive. The very first mention of lipstick-gate was a brief link at 6:53 pm. This was followed by a couple of straight reax posts and then this from Yuval Levin:What do you bet that Charlie Gibson asks Palin about this lipstick thing in her first interview with the media? There goes 2 precious minutes of question time. Tack a question about sexism to that, and you've got 4 minutes controlled!Does anybody really think Obama meant to call Sarah Palin a pig? Come on. Can this really be worth anyone's time?Of course not! That's just dumb! This was then followed by an avalanche of 31 separate posts on the subject in less than 24 hours. Turns out it was worth NR's time after all. And make no mistake: after a couple of hours of momentary confusion about whether they could get away with it, they decided that Obama had indeed meant to call Sarah Palin a pig. By early this morning everyone was obediently on board, the chum was in the water, and the moral dudgeon was so thick you could stir it with a stick. In fact, their only real argument was over how Palin should handle things: attack back or play it cool? (For the most part, they decided cool was the way to go.)
And that, my friends, is how it's done in the big leagues. It's the noise machine at work.
2008-09-11
Kevin Drum Reads National Review
It's a morning full of right-wing blog reading! We do it so you don't have to. Kevin Drum:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
...and Obama fiegned outrage from percieved "racist" comments how many times?
...while using manipulating language in such a way as to infer that McCain is old, without actually saying it. Or better yet, getting his serogates to do it for him.
Post a Comment